OBJECTIVE: SINGLE.
On Facebook pages dedicated to St. Augustine, my country, I read so many topics that may be of interest and partly due to become the comments of someone, only to lose intellectual content through comments others. The common temptation that can be seen, and 'to reopen cases, poorly dormant and not sensational and hard to erase. Example the case of the comic where the city's majority leader in the practice bubble intellectual disabilities as those who "see life only from a PC screen, "people who comment on, or rather, criticize the actions of the junta on blogs and social-networks, often re-emerges. I understand how widespread the illness for this and that 'and will always be a gratuitous insults.
I personally have already responded in writing stating what 'and I think that there would be more to say but eventually people are much smarter and intelligent than the presumption of these pieces can think of institutional and political justice and make the time citizenship. Another topic
applicant and 'lack of participation in the dialectic of advisers during the city council majority, this is a hackneyed theme on which emerge only clumsy attempts to distance itself and pale, meek excuses that do not deserve to be studied. Let them lose, let them go 'cause will determine, as' doing, a certain change in the future 'cause now the size and' bridges and the average Italian, you know, must get to see the height to determine changes. In a moment.
In part, then, the old stories, hackneyed that you see on Facebook, some of which are worthy of in-depth legal issues with no secondary stories related to previous administrations (simulacra of this)
and 'time have a common goal:
DECISION MOTORWAY Cispadana.
I hope that all citizens, not least those who attend the "social networks", focus to argue, suggest, discuss and organize both political and civic initiatives in order to determine a future that will affect us for a century or more.
in this area are also showing very active in civic and not prone to say a resounding no to the work (local committees as "spontaneous high Ferrara Group") and policy actions consistent with the majority and minority that will bring together institutional forum such as conference service requests for changes to the project, not a dry no.
Today is not 'clear whether the "yes, but .." politicians, everyone, is representative of the will of the citizens, start to have some doubts though, I do not totally opposed to the work but rather, shocked at how it expected so far doing little or nothing concrete to interact on the project.
Forget the excuses for decent politics and according to which 'has so far been impossible to "talk" to the region. It should not react.
Pero 'add that a representative of the committees should be invited to play power permanently to the conference service. A representative of Legambiente will be, but given the heterogeneity of the motorways in terms of issues, all the committees be dovrebero ascoltati.Dobbiamo remember and remind, in a word, that the citizen must be more and more ', manifestly, the Democratic Party and the user, not a subject.
Here, then, that I would like all aware that we take for months or years, the goal should remain unique and unambiguous, even on the internet, why not; the face of backward and timid administrators who prefer the agora restricted and pressure the media to ridicule the network and its contributions.
Politicians believe they have a duty to keep an ear cocked to listen to the citizens, even those who write on the net, especially on these choices multigenerational.
Time:
Let them lose the politicians with their written pre-Christmas, tormented and hydro-goers against the network,
leave any further discussion; informiamoci and inform.
participate and we expect to be able to have our say, whatever it is, for total, partial or against this.
And do not be afraid, knowing more on the way information to have the courage to change my mind about it.
It is also for politicians and their conscience.
Target only then, to the center of the future.
The rest, under a stone, please.
0 comments:
Post a Comment