Cartier Trinity Diamond Ring Price

thermolysis, pitch dark!

now? This is the question that arises after it went upstream a unique opportunity, the great meeting in the province that was the promise, hope, the last or the only salvation hook to clarify and possibly stop the construction of the incinerator experimental thermolysis in our municipality is covered by the very superficiality of our administration. The letter of Prof. Montanari, a distinguished scholar of nanoparticles and that this meeting took place a few days ago, local politics and stigmatizes
portends troubling developments on this story. And no way out.
present at the meeting were:
- Ass Bellini prov. FE
- Ing Magri prov. FE
- Dr. Martin prov. FE
- ASL various officials, ARPA
- Tuzet and Bertani com.
percent - Toselli and Grazioli com. St. Augustine
- Balboni and Galantini Eonsudenergia;
- GAD (Committee).
- Democratic
Gasparini Medicine - AGD (Committee).
- High Ferrarese Volunteer Group (the committee)
- Dr. Stefano Montanari
==================================
Here is the text of the letter of Prof. Montanari alderman of the Province. Send a raw, long-winded but simple in essence not very reassuring.
repeat: e.. Now? A great leap in the dark what probably lies ahead amid the indifference of the more after this ... "Gift" of our administrators

Egr. architect Lorenzo Bellini,

must confess did not understand the reason for the meeting yesterday in the Province, a meeting that would have made sense if there was a scientific approach does not say but at least technically. And I must confess also that in many years, I never had happened to find myself in front of so many technical, or assumed, so obviously unprepared, or at least, so curiously silent in the face of blunders
who dropped out. I found it very surprising ignorance of the foundations of chemistry and physics, nothing could be said of medicine, because it has not been possible to get that "far away", but I suspect that, at least for many of gl'intervenuti , they were not of ignorance but of another.

The person presented as "the chemist" by the company revealed proponents un'impreparazione really alarming when one considers that he should somehow be responsible for the effects of the plant, of whatever kind they are or they may be. Leaving aside the lexical ingenuity did not want to define a complex that still reduces incinerator ash in the waste and then burns them when some of these, the non-burned, is gasified, it remains impossible not to wonder how our state is not able to answer my questions for elementary and obvious these were.

That composition has the gas that is burned well over 1,000 ° C? I think anyone would notice that, since ignoring this basic, as was the lack of response, it is impossible to guess what will come from the process and how much. Equally impossible, then, do not ask why those who granted the authorization has not bothered to learn so essential that he should precede any rational consideration of the appropriateness of allowing the go-ahead.

What is composed of the ashes? The answer was embarrassed to say the least embarrassing coal. That would be creepy to any high school teacher who could not but fail without appeal not only a student so ignorant, but so devoid of common sense. Once again it is amazing how the Province can be satisfied with an enormity that even the most imaginative of the alchemists would have dared to say.

powders have been characterized? The answer is read into the astonished gaze of the interlocutor.

Because the system is admittedly experimental parameters that have been tested beyond that of law gl'inceneritori (Not tested)? Silence. Any investigator, for less experienced it may be, is aware of the fact that an experiment is prepared to learn about a phenomenon, a phenomenon as complex as the double-treatment of waste (gasification followed by combustion of the gas produced) implemented on a reagent that chemically inhomogeneous requires far more attention, more controls and more data processing than the law prescribes for something (more or less) known.

Fosse received a response to questions, I would have continued with several other issues also have confidence that even the common place for an insider but were met with impatience and irritation by many present, all too clearly unrelated to any mode of research, even the most basic, and probably under the illusion that what yesterday was not a technical meeting but a chance to repeat the cheap the smoke in all directions, which are wrapped with the realities that constitute the essence of the story.

Continuing in my confessions, I can not add that I found nothing short of shameful action by the bureaucrat who was sitting beside. The attempt to get out of embarrassment by hiding behind an awkward irony , however, very thin, finger incompetence in the matter and to explain all the superficiality with which the Province has given its blessing on the sole basis of many unfounded and so many omissions, are something that I'm afraid not do honor to the institution that represents and can not to instill doubt. The questions do not give a comment: Accept.

In summary, I am not interested in the bureaucratic maze that we created to be prisoners, stamps, signatures and official documents, which I am sure, will all be impeccable in the best tradition. Here it is put into operation a system for which, admittedly, there is no experience and that, as declared, will download at least the atmosphere of that syngas combustion wastes so mysterious, not to mention, then, that the characterization of the ash remains unknown and will do or landfill, or perhaps even more foolishly, in articles . How, then, for the all experiments on plants and animals that no testing of the kind that aspires to a license of seriousness can escape, absolutely nothing. And, missing the initial step, in view of human actors do not even mention. Everything will be perfect and legally unassailable, but, alas, the bureaucracy does not care about the nature and risk of dying or ill according to the law I'm afraid that will not be comforting to anyone.

So, as someone who is committed for many years at the forefront of research in this area, I say without fear of contradiction that a clinical trial with similar conditions as you plan and conduct recklessly to do is not conceivable or in scientific terms or in technical terms or in terms rational and in ethical terms.

I have no interest in knowing the reason for so lightly, but I, instead, to warn that the risk in a population that lightness leads to more kept unaware of reality and in fact turned into a facility free of mice, it is potentially very serious. Groped a mo 'ostrich hiding its head in the sand pretending that the risk, however, for which no assessment is low, and which can stand for a few years, but sooner or later, provided that the potential turns into accident The nodes will be laid on the table with everything that inevitably follows.

I can only, therefore, that invite you to call another meeting, this time, however, consists of technicians who know at least the fundamentals of chemistry, physics and what today is called nanomedicine and, of course, to have known the subject of specific heat treatment of waste. The reasons for the business when it comes to health, must be set aside and must be clear that the questions answered, or with data or with a simple "I do not know," if only to avoid wasting time like it was yesterday when for over half an hour before I left because I lose time with their clothes torn and comedies to the outrage of treason I have not, the only commitment was to embarrassed to evade the questions.

If, in the meantime, those responsible, and it is duty, was able to answer my questions so obvious that few of yesterday, waiting to be able to put other far more numerous and, in a sense, complex, I could be thankful for that.

Sincerely,

Dr. Stefano Montanari